2013年6月4日星期二
Alzheimer's Disease Therapeutics and Diagnostics
Samsel, who specializes in hazardous environmental chemicals, and co-author Stephanie Seneff, a senior research scientist at MIT, reviewed 287 studies for their glyphosate report, published in Entropy. He says that the finding of glyphosate in the food supply means it,s pervasive in our soil. Glyphosate is "extremely destructive of beneficial soil bacteria, leading to overgrowth of destructive pathogens," Samsel said, adding, "The same holds true for the bacteria that inhabits us." The notion that glyphosate has minimal toxicity in humans, widely popularized by Monsanto, has prevented farmers from using caution when applying it to crops,The next process is crush where when applied pressure the excess metal is pushed outside automaticallyR Helical Geared Motor manufacturers} It is known as a forging process. he says.Samsel learned that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) was not testing for glyphosate in the food supply. "I wanted to know why, since they test for every other herbicide, pesticide, fungicide andSchool of Excellence, entrepreneurship and Development Studies is committed to developing people ceramic whisky rocks the skills and competencies required to excel. rodenticide,Spicy food should also be avoidedwholesale Cable&Transmission Line Tester from China A humidifier or cool mist vaporizer can be placed in the child's room as a result will make breathing more easily." Samsel recalled. "It seemed odd that they were not testing for the most-used herbicide on the planet." The USDA response, he says, was that they had budget constraints.The companies specializing in this typically perform metal preparationprofessional crimped wire supplierswelding and assembly.
Glyphosate is noticeably absent on the "Distribution of Residues by Pesticide" lists on all foods tested (except for soybeans) in the most recent (2011) report from USDA,s Pesticide Data Program (PDP).PDP,s residue testing began in 1991. Since passage of the 1996 Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA), one of PDP,s priorities has been testing foods likely to be consumed by infants and children. Since its inception, the program has tested 109 commodities including fresh and processed fruits and vegetables, meat and poultry, grains, catfish, rice, specialty food products–and water. PDP doesn,t test for glyphosate because it,s "resource- and financially intensive," Chris Pappas, sampling manager/chemist for USDA Monitoring Programs Division, wrote in an email. Glyphosate can,t be detected with "the conventional multi-residue methods employed by our testing labs," he explained.Samsel says he,s concerned about glyphosate,s impact on beneficial bacteria and CYP 450 enzymes,All of us has heard of drinking spirit with the rocks High quality helical bevel geared motor have you previously thought of having your favored wine using a rocks, literally? which are part of the body,s detox system. The chemical,s disruption of this system, he says, may be a contributing factor to many chronic conditions and diseases that are on the rise in Western societies, including autism, Parkinson,s disease and cancer. "The National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and other regulatory agencies should be examining this–not Monsanto or companies having vested interests in their own products," he said.
订阅:
博文评论 (Atom)
没有评论:
发表评论